Skip to main content

QoA Gimlet Review

 A Woman’s Touch


PROS:

  • Inoffensive overall sound 

  • Exquisite build with good weight

  • Design and looks

  • Price

  • Mids have good note weight

  • Vocals are lush and engaging

  • Bass have added weight but not overbearing

  • The most relaxing set I’ve listened to

CONS:

  • Not the most technical set

  • Can be too warm for treble heads

  • Detail retrieval is below average


INTRODUCTION:

QoA, also known as Queen of Audio, is a subsidiary of Kinera, and according to information I gathered, both companies are headed by siblings. The design and craftsmanship of both companies share similarities and exude a feminine touch. While Kinera is recognized as the “jeweler” of IEMs, QoA's designs lean towards the female market. Their website showcases 8 IEM models, which you can access through the following link. QoA In-ear-monitors 





This marks my debut review of QoA, as I have had more exposure to and experience with Kinera. Right off the bat, I must assert that Gimlet proved to be a pleasant surprise, and did not fail to meet my expectations. Without further ado, let us delve into its strengths and weaknesses, and identify what it is suited for and what it is not.


FOREWORD:


  • The gear on hand has undergone at least 10-15 hours of use before it was assessed. 

  • No EQ is ever applied in my reviews. 

  • For the sake of convenience, I try my best to use a stock setup. Not everyone has access to personal ear tips or cables. If personal ear tips, cables, or accessories are used, you will be notified. 

  • As I try to be objective, my claims inevitably will be subjective and biased to my personal preference. I cannot stress more that you should take this with a grain of salt for we have different perceptions to sound and what we hear. 



 

SPECIFICATIONS:


Configuration: 1 x 10mm LCP diaphragm DD

Impedance: 32ohms

Sensitivity: 108db

Freq response: 20hz - 20khz



PACKAGING:

The box has an elegant design with a captivating dark green color that resembles the precious "Jade" stone. The packaging style is reminiscent of Kinera's design, and while the inclusions are basic, all the necessary items are present. Kinera usually has a backstory that explains the name of their IEMs, often related to Norse mythology, but QoA's Gimlet lacks this feature, which I somewhat miss.


In the box:

  • a pair of Gimlet IEMs

  • detachable cable

  • carrying case

  • 6 pairs of ear tips 





The Gimlet boasts a sleek and understated appearance, with a heft that remains comfortable even after hours of use. My unit is the white variant, which has a smooth and glossy finish. Positioned at the center of each faceplate is the QoA logo, rendered in white font against a golden backdrop. These IEMs would likely appeal to women who favor luxury brands like Louis Vuitton, Hermes, or Prada and are looking to make a bold fashion statement.


The cable is well-matched with the Gimlet's design, with a color and thickness that will appeal to women. The plugs and pins have a gold accent that blends nicely with the IEMs. A plus is that the cable doesn't produce any bothersome microphonics, which is great for uninterrupted listening sessions.





The carrying case for Gimlet has a luxurious feel to it with a leather texture that will surely appeal to those with a taste for high-end bags. The QoA logo is present but barely visible which will favor minimalism. Despite this, the pouch provides ample room for Gimlet to fit comfortably, unlike the case for my favorite IEM, Idun from Kinera, which tends to cramp the earpieces, leaving me with doubts about its safety.


Two types of soft and wide-bored ear tips are included, each available in small, medium, and large sizes. The ear tips come in two different colors - blue and white. The blue variant is shorter in height while the white one is olive-shaped and a bit taller.


COMFORT and WEAR:

Without a doubt, Gimlet is an incredibly comfortable IEM that won't cause any physical strain, despite its added weight. While the insertion may not be the deepest, it still securely grips my ears and doesn't budge even while I'm on the move. The size of the shell falls in the small to medium range, making it the perfect fit for, as you might have guessed, the lovely ladies out there. Achieving a good seal and fit is a breeze, which is a great advantage for those like me who have a busy schedule and need to take their IEMs on and off frequently throughout the day. 

SOUND IMPRESSIONS:

The Gimlet was used with the Ovidius B1, Centrance Dacport HD, Abilgail pro paired up with Oppo A94 with either Hiby music app or UAPP. My Hiby RS2 dap was also used. Music playback used are Qobuz studio and Apple music subscription and my own FLAC files. The stock cable and ear tips were used. I opted for the blue ear tip variant, wide bore, soft, and shorter. No third party accessories were equipped as to avoid aftermarket sound impact. 





I take Gimlet as a bit underwhelming but adequate in technicalities. It will get you from point A to B. But… Well, let's get right into it. 


The sound stage of Gimlet is not exceptional but still satisfactory. It varies depending on the track being played, and doesn't feel too enclosed and not claustrophobic. The width of tracks from City of the Sun is good and I sensed adequate wideness. However, there is no noteworthy depth or height to mention. Hence, more like a 2d experience and not holographic. 


The imaging on the Gimlet is quite clear, but it's not the most accurate compared to other IEMs. The elements in the music tend to be placed at the center, resulting in a fixed and stable presentation with little room for playfulness. Although some may find this boring, personally, I find it not at all disappointing.


The dynamic driver's speed on Gimlet is relaxed and laid-back, resulting in a soft and natural portrayal of notes that aren't overly defined. The attack is relatively gentle, and the decay has a good natural quality with note tail ends that are well-presented.





The tonality and timbre of Gimlet are highly captivating, especially for individuals who prefer a smooth sound presentation. The sound quality is incredibly musical, organic, and natural, evoking a sense of liveliness in the listener's ears.


Gimlet's weakest point in terms of technical performance is its separation. I find that different elements in my music blend together instead of being precisely separated, which is a downside for me since I need to dissect individual elements for my daily work. However, my wife, who is a vocalist, really enjoys using this set as she mainly focuses on the main melody of a song. Nonetheless, if she were to analyze vocal harmonies, it might be a bit challenging for her.


BASS:

The bass of the Gimlet presents a decent note weight with just enough elevation to provide that engaging factor. It may not be the most agile, as the bass tends to be soft, gentle, and pillowy most of the time. The sub-bass rumble is present when needed, and tracks from Billie Eilish are still enjoyable. While the mid-bass is prominent, it does not take center stage, and there is no slam or punch in Gimlet's presentation, making it less desirable for those who prefer a well-defined bass. Despite this, the bass reproduction remains clean, although muddiness may occasionally arise. 




MIDRANGE:

The warm sound signature of Gimlet gives the midrange a lush and rich quality that I find commendable, despite its slightly recessed character which usually turns me away. Even though there is a significant dip in the lower midrange according to the graph, it does not sound pushed back. Meanwhile, the upper midrange is emphasized but still tuned smoothly, producing no sibilance or hotness. I enjoy listening to female vocals and brass instruments like sax, trumpet, trombones and horns, which all have good presence without causing fatigue. Overall, everything sounds smooth and pleasing to the ear.





TREBLE:

To begin with, Gimlet has a significant warm sound profile. It presents a laid-back and relaxed vibe, which is primarily due to its treble. Although this may be pleasing for sensitive listeners, I noticed that many nuances and details seem to be lacking. Don't get me wrong; the details are present, but what's missing is the texture of the instruments. The smoothness is excellent, but I believe QoA intentionally designed Gimlet this way to provide a more calming listening experience rather than an analytical one. While I can still distinguish 90% of the instruments, the micro details are less prominent and, at times, not audible at all. However, with this warmth, the treble doesn't sound overly thin and produces good weight. This is unlike more neutral sets that can sometimes be dull to listen to. Cymbals and hi-hats are my favorite elements to monitor when it comes to treble, and with Gimlet, there's no danger of it sounding fatiguing, piercing, or sibilant. But there is a downside: nuances, micro details, and much of that energy on top are somewhat compromised.


COMPARISONS:

Let's move on to a quicker comparison between single dynamic driver candidates at this price point. I will present my comparisons in bullet points to make it easier to follow. I'll be focusing on two of my preferred single dynamic driver in-ear monitors, both of which are priced under $100 and are therefore comparable to Gimlet.



versus Dunu Titan S

  • Both are warmish in overall sound but Titan S is a shy bit brighter. 

  • Sound stage goes to Titan S. 

  • Technicalities are better with Titan S. 

  • Separation goes to Titan S.

  • Titan S is closer to neutrality. 

  • Gimlet gives a more engaging sound profile. 

  • Gimlet is much safer for long listening sessions. 

  • Titan S has a higher detail retrieval. 


To sum up, it can be said that Titan S outperforms Gimlet in nearly every aspect, but Gimlet may have more appeal to the general consumer due to its versatility. Gimlet delivers a smooth U-shaped sound, whereas Titan S leans more towards a neutral sound reproduction.


versus Simgot EA500

  • EA500 is without a doubt, the brighter set. 

  • EA500 can be fatiguing to some listeners, Gimlet will never be fatiguing. 

  • EA500 wins in technical aspects. 

  • EA500 has better details. 

  • Gimlet sounds more organic and natural in timbre. 

  • EA500 can get sibilant at times. 

  • EA500 has better agility and speed. 


The EA500 outperforms Gimlet in technical aspects; however, Gimlet has an advantage in terms of timbre. The EA500 is crafted to be more analytical, while Gimlet prioritizes the pure enjoyment of music.

SOURCES USED:


  • Hiby RS2

  • Ovidius B1

  • Centrance Dacport HD

  • Abigail pro 3.5mm

  • Qobuz Studio

  • Apple Music 

  • Hiby music app

  • UAPP



TEST TRACKS:

Here are some tracks I usually listen to when reviewing: 


That’s the way of the World by EWF

Africa by TOTO

The Girl in the Other Room by Diana Kral

Balmorhea album All is wild, All is Silent

Sila by Sud

Smooth Escape by D’Sound

Never too Much by Luther Vandross

P.Y.T by Michael Jackson

Ain’t no Sunshine by Eva Cassidy

Shoot to Thrill by AC/DC

Another one bites the Dust by Queen

Good times bad times by Edie Brickell 

Alice in Wonderland by Bill Evans

Ain’t it Fun by Paramore

 Redefine by Incubus

Far Away by Nickelback

Lovesong by Adele

Lingus by Snarky Puppy

Harvest for the World by Vanessa Williams

Love Bites by Def Leppard

No Such Thing by John Mayer

As by Stevie Wonder

Whip Appeal by Babyface

Ain’t Nobody by Chaka Khan

Futures by Prep

Landslide by Fleetwood Mac

Every Summertime by NIKI

SADE tracks

AC/DC tracks

Queen tracks



And many more… I always listen to High resolution format, being the least quality 16bit/44khz FLACS be it offline or online. 





VERDICT:

To begin with, I believe that Gimlet is a unique IEM that caters to a specific market. In my opinion, it is most suited to female listeners. As audiophiles, many of us men are preoccupied with details, nuances, and analytical listening. Women, on the other hand, tend to enjoy music for the pure pleasure it brings. Gimlet's smooth and relaxed sound signature aligns well with this listening style.


From a musician's perspective, I found Gimlet lacking in certain technical aspects. While it is enjoyable to listen to, it does not prioritize the textures and micro-details that are important to me. This is a significant drawback, and I cannot see myself purchasing the IEM for my personal use.


Despite this, I must commend Gimlet for taking a different approach than many of the other releases in the Chifi market. It is refreshing to see an IEM designed for music enjoyment rather than technical analysis. While I may not buy Gimlet for myself, I believe it would make a great gift for a female friend or even for my wife.


Lastly, I would like to express my gratitude to Martin Esguerra for facilitating this tour, and to QoA for the opportunity to experience QoA for the first time. Thank you, and I look forward to the next review.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hiby R6 Pro II review

The bridge between a phone and a DAP   INTRODUCTION : Hiby, a company founded in 2011, has gained considerable respect in the audio community for their Digital Audio Players (DAPs). I happen to own one of their DAPs, the RS2 , which incorporates R2R technology. Surprisingly, I haven't shared my review of it yet, even though I've had it for a couple of months now. Besides their expertise in DAPs, Hiby is also expanding their product range to include In-Ear Monitors (IEMs), such as the Crystal 6 II and Zeta , which I will be reviewing. Noteworthy offerings from Hiby also include DAC/Amps like the FC6 , FC1 , FC3 , and FC4 , which you can explore further on their website . One aspect where Hiby shines is their music app, highly regarded within the audio community. The Hiby music app stands out as an impressive solution that bypasses Android's audio sample limitation, enabling the use of external DAC/AMP for bit-perfect and unaltered audio output. The best part? It's absol...

Audiosense AQ7 Insight - One step further toward neutrality

  PROS : Stupendous instruments and vocals placement Bright-neutral sound signature (subjective) Brilliant speed and transients Clarity, transparency, and detail retrieval Precision Sound stage and imaging Very easy to drive that even mobile phones can give justice CONS : Huge shells might not be for everyone BA timbre Might be too dry for the casual listener (subjective) Less organic and natural sound presentation (nitpick) INTRODUCTION: Audiosense is one of the companies I have high regard for at the same level as I adore Seeaudio, Tangzu, BQEYZ, and Kinera. I recently purchased one of their IEMs the DT300. I have not reviewed it yet and I don’t want to spoil what I intend to say on that gear. But what I can say is that Audiosense really knows how to tune and make exquisite gears. Their DT and AQ series received much love from the audio community a few months ago.  And what I have for you today is a mid-range installment of roughly 500$ give or take, the AQ7 Insight. Will th...